[-empyre-] "Autofiction" as "Self fiction" and phenomenology as anthropology of the time.

["Aliette Guibert" <guibertc@criticalsecret.com>]

Concerning Ken's book at last...

As auto-fiction or autofiction (the French word) I want to tell of
respective self-fiction of the author. That designs a phenomenological
territory of the experimental reference or/ and event.

Sorry of my "barbarism" as what I have to say on "A hacker manifesto" cannot
take sense if there would be a misunderstanding on this point.

A possible abstract of
Phenomenology of the perception (Merleau-Ponty) - quoted:

" Having studied the experiment of the body in the first part of the
Phenomenology of the perception, Merleau-Ponty passes in the experiment of
the world. The main part is the joint (articulation?) between these two
experiments which get involved each other, in the point to form only one.
His reflection develops from the analysis of a paradigmatical case: the
perception of the cube, in echo in the second Cartesian Consideration of
Husserl. He shows that the object does not recover from a pure intellectual
synthesis the experience of which would be only the occasion; the object
comes to light in an experience the physical lived of which, better than a
simple "circumstance", is actively involved. "

For my part it is what appears to take place in Ken's ''hacker'' and
naturally, this integrates his real living time and of activity (as direct
experiment) with the environmental or historic culture inherited (as
indirect experiment).

Cheers
A.

PS/
Here is a trick furthermore to make feel guilty either to victimiser or to
punish or to divide here:)
On matrixial mother well capacitating, even with the help of the
psychoanalysis knowledge, I would want that we speak to me about the role of
the women in the vendetta carried out by the men since the Greek tragedy...
Openly neither the mothers nor the girls are necessarily happier than
phallus equipped of their creative weapons or -excessively equipped by the
women anyway :)))

I have never believed that the women are better than the men even at the
riders... another illusion which goes away... Furthermore, the benefit by
the well-or-vigilant-maternization too late granted to the men does not
compensate for the one which would have been lacking to them in the infancy
(in self reality as in collective reality):)

Sociologically a hypothesis, always phenomenological is: the woman would be
interesting more than the man not as for the destruction (such as the man in
his predatory state) but of the evil (too much oppression makes sly and
far-sighted:) don(don't you think so ?

Of course I am a Latin to tell of. But after all what of Elizabeth the 1rst
of England ? She was not cool really:)